Was Richard III really the scheming, villanous tyrant Shakespeare so powerfully depicted in his tragedy?
"… the purpose and indeed the strength of the Richard III Society derive from the belief that the truth is more powerful than lies - a faith that even after all these centuries the truth is important. It is proof of our sense of civilised values that something as esoteric and as fragile as reputation is worth campaigning for."
What they reject is the portrait Shakespeare drew from Sir Thomas More's biography of the last Plantagenet kings, Edward IV first, his younger brother Richard III then.
What was the full Thomas More treatment, that still seems to be current in some quarters? Let us look at the dossier that has been built up against Richard III: